Onion Information

Page Clicks: 0

First Seen: 04/26/2024

Last Indexed: 10/23/2024

Domain Index Total: 23

sieve's storage 5yara 6veaa 7vxak [ posts ] [ 7ache ] [ sieve ] torrorism this article might trigger ahmia's censors but that was bound to happen eventually. see this pdf? it's a compilation of texts about painlessly reforming the status quo in hopes of achieving your own goals. that being an euphemism for violent uprising. the authors tried to strip the original texts of their original political affiliations, but it's still very obvious. if the writing is formal, the original is probably far-left, if it's casual, far-right. if there are too many grammar mistakes, it was almost definitely jihadist. the first chapter describes how you should prepare for the operation: There are several things that should be done by the guerrilla before starting the process of planning and taking up armed struggle. The first of which is to surround yourself (either online or in real life) with people who support your political ideology but who at the same time does not jeopardize your security in any way. you should always assume whoever you're interacting with is actively trying to spoil your operations. even online, there is a risk of conceding information to your enemy directly or indirectly when you interact with others. You should therefore avoid any affiliations with known extremists or such groups as they are most likely flagged (individuals and groups who are monitored by your national intelligence agency on so called "watch lists"). you should also assume your enemy has extensive knowledge of everyone you collaborate with. The second is to prepare to leave everyone else you know behind and prepare for a lonely, poor and potentially painful existence of hardship and uncertainty. As a guerrilla, you are a part of an indestructible network of cells, spread all around the world that functions without a central command. more importantly, a "network of cells" could obey a central command.> extremist organizations operate in cells because that offers more flexibility. if one cells gets busted, the others are not affected, if there was a central command, all cells would be affected by its likely demise. however, there are two methods that ensure the safety of the central command while retaining its purpose within the movement. the easy method is to arrange an "informational cell" for the sole purpose of guiding the extremists, publishing content anonymously and never carrying out any activity for the sake of its own security. the biggest problem with this is placing trust in an unknowable cell, how does a group build a reputation within an extremist movement without carrying out any activity? the difficult option is to have an overt branch to the movement. as kaczynski stated: A revolutionary movement should consist of two separate and independent sectors, an illegal, underground sector, and a legal sector. I'll say no thing about what the illegal sector should do. The legal sector (if only for its own protection) should carefully avoid any connection with the illegal sector. this arrangement is most useful for organizations with political purposes. the apparent parts of the movement indoctrinate people and organize protests and whatnot, while the real action is orchestrated by the underground sectors. i really cant concentrate can i its contents available only through anonymous networks and maybe physical media (guerrillas shouldn't access the internet), spread by extremists to extremists. extremist organizations operate in cells because that offers more flexibility. if one cells gets busted, the others are not affected, if there was a central command, all cells would be affected by its likely demise. however, nowadays there are means of distributing information with almost no possibility of it ever being correlated to the messenger. that means an "informational cell" could be arranged for the sole purpose of guiding the rest of the movement, it also means risk-free communication between cells of the same ideology, though each cell would still have to assume everything they say to each other is being intercepted. the biggest problem with centralized command is placing trust in this anonymous cell, how does a group build a reputation within an extremist movement without carrying out any activity? maybe this cell