Motivations for dropping JPEG-XL - Seirdy


I do find their decision to drop JPEG-XL from Chromium problematic because it was clearly an example of them ignoring everyone else, showing the limits of



Onion Details



Page Clicks: 0

First Seen: 03/11/2024

Last Indexed: 10/21/2024

Domain Index Total: 190



Onion Content



I do find their decision to drop JPEG-XL from Chromium problematic because it was clearly an example of them ignoring everyone else, showing the limits of Chromium’s collaborative decision making. However, “pushing their own formats” wasn’t one of their reasons: Google also dropped plans to make its WebP2 project a real image format at around the same time Google helped define the JPEG-XL spec Google developed the Butteraugli project, which was incorporated into JPEG-XL The reference implementation (libjxl) is mostly a Google project Google is a big part of JPEG-XL, yet Google dropped it along with its own WebP2 a while after seeing AVIF gain widespread support. I previously shared my thoughts on the issue in this post: Google drops Webp2 and JPEG-XL .