debconf5 | See you in hel


It maybe better to fork this off into a BOF. * Why am I qualified for this talk? The principle reason is that I won't be developing the content or speaking alone. Topics are being worked out with the debian-kernel team, and there will ...



Onion Details



Page Clicks: 0

First Seen: 03/11/2024

Last Indexed: 10/22/2024

Domain Index Total: 71



Onion Content



Skip navigation . Debian-Kernel Team Oveview and Status Proposal details: Abstract: I would like to lead attending members of the debian-kernel team in a talk that will serve as a status update for our team. The Debian Kernel Team has been around for about a year now. Discussion topics would be mostly technical, but would include both social (how we work together) and political (non-free firmware) as well. Technical topics include: Introduction - Who are we, and what do we do? * Maintenance of kernel-[source,image,patch-ARCH], initrd-tools, etc * security for testing/unstable * Package architecture. What packages does our team create, and what are they for? * kernel-tree vs. kernel-source * What kernel-headers do I need? * What is the right way to file a bug? * What bugs should be filed against the 'kernel' package, vs. a real package. * Classes of bugs * Build issues * Runtime issues * Where can you find our source? An overview of our svn repo. * Daily build testing - Simon Horman and I have both done some work in this area; hopefully we'll have some results by DebConf5 time. * What requirements must a patch fulfill before we will include it * Interacting with the debian-installer team (l-k-di) * ABI changes; what they're for and why the suck * Exist for module compatability * Break upgrades (anecdotal ia64/vfat issue?) * How ABI breaks break debian-installer * Testing for ABI breaks * How to build additional modules for our precompiled kernel-images * How the architectures work together (or not) - sharing configs, build system; sharing source vs. kernel-patch-ARCH packages. * All-kernels-from-one-source-package plans. Sven Luther has been looking into building most (or all) of our kernels from a single source package. What are the benefits? What are the bottlenecks? What is the status? * What areas can we use help? * Firmware; what is acceptable and what's not. This topic maybe one to avoid, due to its political nature. It maybe better to fork this off into a BOF. * Why am I qualified for this talk? The principle reason is that I won't be developing the content or speaking alone. Topics are being worked out with the debian-kernel team, and there will be at least a few of us around to give the actual talk. I began a discussion of topics last month: http:/]2F2F2Flists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/02/msg00017.html I also plan to prepare the talk with the group. I've setup a wiki for this purpose: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelDebconf5 My personal involvement with the debian-kernel team has been mostly as a port maintainer. I took over maintenance of the ia64 kernel packages from Bdale a little over a year ago now, and I co-maintained these packages for some time before that. I converted the packages from a rather manual system to an architecture similar to Herbert Xu's, and began tracking his kernel-source packages. Once I joined the kernel team, I worked with Christopher Hellwig to merge the ia64 2.6 patches into our shared kernel-source package. I also created the ia64 versions of the linux-kernel-di packages. Outside of my porter role, I help out with the occasional security patch or bug fix. Qualification Links: The 2.6/ia64 subtree of our svn repository: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/trunk/kernel/ia64/?rev=0&sc=0 A couple of tools I created to provide daily status: http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kern-dep.html Some documentation I wrote: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelTree My first archived commit: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/kernel-svn-changes/2004-July/000021.html And participation in what I think was our only formal irc meeting: http://minbar.dodds.net/~vorlon/kernel-2.6.10-discussion.log Presentation type: Talk (45 min) Track: Technical Status: Accepted Authors: dann frazier Files: debconf5-kernel-talk-0.2.tar.gz (110 K) Paper, v0.2 - TeX & PDF formats debconf5-kernel-talk-0.3.tar.gz (10 K) Paper, v0.3 - TeX & PDF formats Debconf 5 Powered by COMAS , the Conference Management System by CONSOL